The word "genocide", Raphael (1900-1959) Lemkin, a Polish Jewish jurist, coined in 1943, was introduced by the Latin word "Gens, gentis," "clan, tribe, or race" or Greek root means before, genos (family, tribe, or race - tion) (? Y), the second in Latin cide (Western massacre, kill). According to Lemkin, generally speaking, genocide does not happen immediately when a nation is a nation accomplished by mass killings of all members,
but not destruction. Intention, but that various actions aimed at destroying their own groups essential foundation of life, destruction of the group, means a coordinated plan. The scheme of political and social institutions, culture, language, national feelings, religion and economic existence of national groups, and personal security, liberty, health, dignity and the destruction of the lives of members of these groups will be dissolved. Resolution 96 (1), 11 December 1946, the
"Human rights" or entirely cultural or socially constructed (a common sight, as the other parameters, oddly enough dissing, but the so-called post-modern "left" as a rule at the very front, as a caricature, Even more, the "pragmatists by the" / formalists are usually / middle ... probably ditch the more modern / postmodern than anything else) is a common criticism, but many scientists / feel it / etc I still think it has something in common that at least some common denominator of humanity.
And examples of the opposite of tradition and often reductionist, ignoring, of course, there is a change (multiple levels of control, power structures, views, etc..) "Other cultures do not" often "common values" are examples of the worst examples , knowing that these negative examples in our culture "moral" can be found in No. Each course of human rights activists, the Bush administration's claims in the universality of X or Y first. hard part is sorting out What is being discussed and what the world be a better place to be creative is to see through the illusion.